Malaysian Malaysia

This news item appeared in the Sun 29th August 2007. I am just speechless.

"Zam accuses theSun of promoting 'Malaysian Malaysia' KUALA LUMPUR (Aug 28, 2007): Information Minister Datuk Seri Zainuddin Maidin said today Gerakan adviser Datuk Seri Dr Lim Keng Yaik's assumption that the Malay and Chinese newspapers favour certain parties and are not fair to all the races was inaccurate.

On the contrary, in many issues, "the Chinese and Malay newspapers are fairer to Malaysia than certain English newspapers.

"To say that theSun newspaper is a champion of Bangsa Malaysia shows that Dr Lim Keng Yaik sympathises with the newspaper which has all this while fought more for (the DAP's) 'Malaysian Malaysia'. "In many issues, theSun newspaper has touched on matters that offend the Malays, including the special rights of the Malays, the New Economic Policy (NEP), the social contract among the races that was agreed upon before Merdeka and also the question of unity in the society," he told a news conference after attending an "Anak-anak Merdeka and Malaysia" gathering in Angkasapuri here today.

(Anak-anak Merdeka are those born on Aug 31, 1957, when the country achieved independence and the Anak Malaysia are those born when Malaysia was formed on Sept 16, 1963.)

Lim, who is Energy, Water and Telecommunications Minister, was quoted as saying in Penang on Sunday (Aug 26) that theSun had used the Malaysian approach compared with the other newspapers, which according to him, were biased towards certain parties.

Zainuddin said the newspaper often blew up issues that contradict the federal constitution besides "publishing statements that oppose and question the government's action to suspend the Makal Osai newspaper recently".

He said the government acted to ensure that every religion was respected and it showed that the government cared about religious sensitivities.

"The Chinese newspapers, which are written and read by the Chinese, do not involve the feelings of the other races but the English language newspapers must be more careful because they are read by all the people," he said.

Zainuddin said theSun had also blown up the issue of the Merdeka Statement, the so-called wish list of the majority of the society which, among others, claimed that racial unity had been fraying at the edges.

"theSun has also published articles which leaked government secrets.They have also blown up the issue of the proposal to repeal the Common Law and published articles rejecting the proposal when it had not been decided whether to implement it," he said.

"I've kept the article. What we considered as discussed in the Cabinet was published by theSun.

"What is theSun up to? Are they fighting for a Malaysian Malaysia? Is this what (Datuk Seri Dr) Lim Keng Yaik says is a newspaper that fights for Bangsa Malaysia?" he asked.

"Bangsa Malaysia must be founded on the social contract, the country's principles of law, not outside this (aspect)," he said, reports Malaysia's national news agency Bernama.

Zainuddin said theSun should be viewed as a newspaper that supports the DAP because it fought for a "Malaysian Malaysia", which is the DAP's objective."

Bribes

This letter to the editor was published in the Star of 27th August 2007.

"Don’t resort to bribery when caught

AN SMS published in The Star on Aug 24 caught my attention. “D figure dat 40% of policemen r corrupt is 2 modest. I am an old man n i’ve never met a policeman who refuses 2 selesai.”

Let's go back to the root cause of bribery and corruption, and how we, the people on the street, contribute to it.

If we obey traffic laws, will the police stop us and issue a summons?

If we follow the law, wear a seat belt, obey the traffic lights, do not use the handphone while driving, do not jump queue, do not speed, and have a valid driving licence and road tax, there will be no reason for the police to issue us summonses.

To those who are stopped for flouting traffic rules, please just accept the summons (because you did wrong), and go pay at the police station.

But most people choose to selesai because they want to save money and time.

Bribing the police when we are at fault and then accusing the police of being corrupt is not the right thing to do.

I suggest that those who keep getting summons, and find it hard to obey traffic rules and laws, stop driving. Either you employ a good driver or use a cab.

I OBEY TRAFFIC RULES,

Kuala Lumpur."

This point of view assumes that we did break the law. But sometimes, don't doubts creep in questioning why we were detained? We have come to a point when the sight of the man in blue conjures images of detention in a jail or at least the dreaded track to the nearest police station.

The man in blue do not represent those who are there to help us in our times of need but someone who wants to take advantage of our misfortunes. There have been countless tales of the callous attitude of those wearing that uniform.

This might be a generalisation, but that is the prevalent feel we have about the entire force. A sad truth.

Commuters to blame

This news item that appeared in the Star 13 August 2007 caught my eye. Here is the full article.

"Commuters urged to be more prepared for Merdeka

By ELAN PERUMAL

POOR travel planning by commuters resulted in long queues and congestion at Putra LRT stations in KLCC recently.

There was nothing that Rangkaian Pengangkutan Integrasi Deras Sdn Bhd (RapidKL) could do about the situation since there was sudden surge in the number of commuters due to the Pikom PC Fair, said RapidKL rail operations division general manager Azmi Abdul Aziz.

He said the long queues and congestion were caused by commuters dependent on counters and vending machines to obtain tickets.

Azmi said there were not many people who took advantage of the monthly pass, prepaid travel cards and Touch&Go and the situation would not have been as bad if the majority of commuters had avoided obtaining tickets from the counters and vending machines.

According to him, RapidKL had done its best and even increased the counters from one to five and provided attendants offering change for those queuing up at vending machines.

“We feel sorry for the inconvenience caused but we can only improve the situation to a certain level as there were 3,000 commuters flocking the station.

“The situation lasted for six long hours and we had a tough time overcoming the long queues,” he said

He also thanked the commuters who had conducted themselves well as there were no untoward incidents reported at the time.

Azmi advised commuters not to be overly dependent on ticket counters and vending machines if they wished not to be caught in similar situations in the future.

For commuters who used the LRT on a daily basis, he said the monthly pass would be the best option since it was only being sold at RM90 with unlimited usage.

“Others can obtain prepaid tickets and Touch&Go cards from our counters so that they can go into train platforms without having to queue up for tickets.” he said

Azmi hoped that commuters would be more prepared for the upcoming Merdeka Day countdown event on Aug 30 and 31.

“We are expecting more than 100,000 people to commute on the LRT and we will do our best to improve the quality of service and the frequency of the trains,” he said."

The first paragraph itself made my blood boil, "Poor travel planning by commuters resulted in the long queues and congestion at Putra LRT stations recently?"

Were there enough signs to encourage commuters to use prepaid tickets and Touch & Go cards before they use the trains? Haven't the management learnt anything for the past ten odd years? Whenever there is a crowd pulling event near any of the stations, the crowd will be at least ten fold than the usual number. Don't tell me you have not prepared for that kind of numbers. Don't you want those numbers? Aren't those numbers that are keeping you in the black, I hope.

Please give the commuters some respect. We did plan our journey. Didn't we leave our cars and use the public transportation system as urged by all and sundry?

Facing a harsh reality

This letter from a reader was published in the Star 10 August 2007.

I refer to “Foreign workers getting a better deal than locals” (The Star, Aug 9). It appears that the writer is looking at the employment scenario from an idealistic point of view.

This is a world where people have a choice to work where and how they wish, provided they have the basic desire to work, to progress in life, to develop a country’s economy, and to help children achieve their dreams.

People work to give themselves an opportunity to better themselves, to take care of their needs.

Whether local or foreigner, work is work and employers want someone who has the qualification, qualities and desire to work. And it’s the employer’s prerogative who they choose and decide to employ.

Please allow me to elaborate on what happens on the other side of the foreign coin.

Both local and foreign workers enjoy a basic pay (if one refers to salary earned as an enjoyment!) and I can guarantee you that not all foreign workers are guaranteed overtime.

Only common sense will tell you that any visitor/worker who lives in a foreign country needs accommodation and other basic facilities. And we’re not talking about five-star hotel facilities.

Here, basic can mean living in a shoplot premises together with more than 25 others, and queuing to use the one toilet/bathroom with broken doors and slimy floors and walls.

Premises have inadequate ventilation; are infested with cockroaches and rats; without space to hang wet clothes to dry; and food preparation is done on the floor.

Transportation is given in poorly maintained vehicles without air-conditioning; with blackened torn/broken seats and driven by locals who consume stimulants. Cost of rental and utilities are equally divided and deducted from the workers’ salary.

The reason foreigners seem to earn more is mainly because they know how to save more, in order to feed, clothe and educate their loved ones back home.

They can live on plain white rice, vegetable dhall curry and a weekly meat treat. A group of five will contribute RM1 each to buy half a chicken that is cooked and shared by them.

Are the local workers prepared to work under such conditions?

Fees/commissions will always be paid to low income recruitment agents or high-end headhunters, local or foreign. And the recruitment fees are deducted from the workers' salary for six months to one year by the employers. Upon renewal of the yearly work permit, the deduction is repeated.

The cost of yearly medical checkups are also deducted from the salary. They work 365 days, 12 hours a day without overtime. And when they take leave, their salary is deducted.

Are the local workers prepared to work in such conditions for a so-called higher salary?

This is the hidden reality of life among foreign workers. There’s nothing free in life.

P. TULADHAR,
Kuala Lumpur.

I just want to answer the question "Are the local workers prepared to work in such conditions for a so-called higher salary?" Definitely NOT.
I guess we have been blessed with so much that very few are willing to go back to that kind of basics to earn a living. Our forefathers may have done so, and I'm sure those starting a new life elsewhere are willing to do the same. But the locals demand a minimum. And if we are honest enough with ourselves, the foreign workers should also be given a minimum. Not the inhumane treatment they are getting now.
But I doubt humanity is in the minds of the employers. As long as the money comes in with minimal expenses, everyone should be contented.

Positive improvement

The news in the New Sunday Times of 5 August 2007 brought a smile back to me. The article did give some hope to the disabled which one day might even include yours truly. I guess the Air Asia management have a human side after all. I do hope this proactive attitude is not just a flash in the pan but an ongoing paradigm shift of the Malaysian psyche. I just can't help but wonder the reasons behind the sometimes atrocious way Malaysians deal with those less fortunate than themselves. Just look at the way our northern neighbour handles the same situation. Can't we take a leaf out of them?