I can empathise with the
misgivings that a writer
of the letter to the editor's page mentioned on the not so rapid
RapidKL buses plying the city routes. The writer had to take three
buses from her home to her work place and waits at the bus stop by
5.50 am. She'll reach her destination by 9 am or sometimes even 9.30
am. That is a three hours of commuting time and most probably the
same time is spent in the evenings. Can you imagine six hours every
working day spent using our “rapid” buses? The culprit is a
connecting bus that does not seem to be running on schedule. We hear
the same grouses regarding shuttle bus services that service the
light rail transit commuters.
The usual explanation
would be that congested roads delayed the bus and the management
apologises for any inconvenience caused. That often repeated phrase
“the management apologises for any inconvenience caused” would
get my vote as one of the most misused in circulation among our
service providers. An apology by itself does not bring back the hours
wasted waiting for the bus or looking for further information on why
a delay occurred and when it can be rectified. The service
provider's personnel suddenly are not to be seen when the passenger
wants to seek a clarification. We have to depend on other fellow
passengers instead to find out what has transpired.
A six hours journey seems
such an oxymoron when we have the highways criss-crossing every
residential area and business centre in the city. Alas, the highways
are built to ease the journey of the cars, usually single occupied.
The much touted national car industry has indirectly spawned the
highways that kept being built to cater for the increasing number of
cars. Everyone wants a car for the convenience since the public
transport system is unable to bring someone from one place to another
within a reasonable time.
The freedom to drive on
your own even when you are stuck in the traffic contrasts with the
uncertainty of when you will reach your destination if using the
public transport. Buses are not a priority in the town planners
master plan but highways are almost always indicated with those
dotted lines when we look at maps of new housing areas. Buses could
never compete with cars until and unless a radical overhaul is made
to give priority to the public transportation system. This does not
just mean the billions of ringgit that will be spend extending the
current light rail transport lines or building the mass rapid
transport system but a more holistic approach that puts the emphasis
on the humble bus again.
Can we ever even dream of
having a reliable public transport system in future? Maybe that day
will come when the Prime Minister himself commutes by bus to his
office or the Parliament House.
Image from transitmy
No comments:
Post a Comment