I am uncertain
whether the news
that future fatwa by Kedah mufti or fatwa committee cannot be
challenged in court is really a wise decision. The mufti and
committee are presumably men of learning but they are still man,
warts and all. When a ruling that any fatwa cannot be challenged is
established, where do we go for redress if any new evidence is found
that is not consistent with the fatwa. I'm thinking of the future
when discoveries in so many fields will affect our everyday lives.
The nature of the global village will affect muslims everywhere
including in this country. More information and knowledge can give a
different perspective on certain issues that might not be consistent
with a fatwa.
The past has shown a few
controversies involving fatwas. For example the yoga ban a few years
ago was promulgated by the National Fatwa Council because it contains
elements of another religion. Muslims do not have an avenue to
challenge such a ruling if we are in Kedah but I guess we can still
do whatever we want in the privacy of our homes. Oh, but I forgot the
incident when an American couple was raided in their room in Langkawi
in 2008. That raid is part and parcel of a fatwa, right?
A fatwa's tentacles reach
far and wide even in the privacy of our homes. The most obvious
beneficiary would be the religious authority enforcement officers.
They are the ones who will try their best to ensure that a fatwa is
followed to the letter. They will no doubt be joyous that their
powers to lord it over others cannot be challenged and overstepping
their authority might well occur. That is the danger inherent when
there is no avenue to challenge any ruling.
I'm fine with rulings as
long as I can have further clarification on them when the need arises
or even question the relevance of the ruling. This new edict would
stifle discussions and exchange of ideas. I am just a layman and
would like to know the reasons behind any fatwa. If the reasons seem
unconvincing, don't I have the option to question and query before
accepting the ruling?
Image from modernanalyst
No comments:
Post a Comment