Air Asia Flight Delays

Just when I thought I could say something nice about Air Asia, they had to disappoint me again by the latest news item in today'’s the star newspaper. I had a pleasant trip to Bali last month by Air Asia. They even had an in-flight competition for some prizes in conjunction with their sponsorship of the Amazing Race Asia reality television programme.

Alas, my hopes of a sustained improvement in services might not last long. The reason for the delay this time is the extra time taken to check the planes. I do hope this extra precaution is not in vain. The customers do understand the need for safety but being left in the dark with no coordination in dispensing correct and up to date information is a big minus point. There are limits to anyoneÂ’s patience. We do hope passenger feedback will be taken seriously and improvements done to the system.

Hope.

One rule for the rich and another for the rest of us

That is the heading of a letter in thestar of 6th November 2006.

No ground breaking news here. Has it ever been otherwise?

Time to change people’s attitudes

This letter appeared in thestar of 4 November 2006.

Nothing much to add to what has been written in the letter but I do agree wholeheartedly with the sentiments of the writer. Needless to say, I should also not forget to thank a certan leader for promoting a certain vision for the country. Today, we get our just rewards.

Pot calling the kettle black

A case of short memory or is it selective recollection. The full details are in the web edition of the sun of 23rd October 2006.

Extracts:

"Q: You said Malaysia has become a police state. Isn'’t is ironic because your critics said the same thing about your administration?
A: I never stopped people from making speeches. In 1987, when Tengku Razaleigh, Musa Hitam and Abdullah Ahmad Badawi challenged me, Abdullah remained as minister. They were travelling all over the country, campaigning with Umno branches and divisions and I never stopped them. But of course, Pak Lah now says he was stopped. Umno branches said they heard him when he came to talk. And I know because when I went to his area to speak, he came up on the stage and he spoke also. I never stopped him from speaking. I never stopped Tengku Razaleigh from speaking, which is why, although I was nominated by 86 divisions and Tengku Razaleigh was nominated by 37 divisions, I barely managed to win because of the intensive campaigning carried out by Tengku Razaleigh, Musa Hitam and Abdullah Ahmad Badawi. But now, I am not allowed to speak to anybody. I know I'’m speaking to the Press now. I know some media companies will make some kind of spin about this but fortunately for us that in my time, we have the Internet, so I would advise people to read the Internet and not these newspapers because they are all getting phone calls."

I never stopped people from making speeches??? Duh. ISA, Operasi Lalang, Printing Press Act.

"Q: It seems that you have made a terrible mistake in choosing the Prime Minister.
A: Well I have made a lot of mistakes. I chose people and they all turn against me. I'’m very bad, really. You know when people come to me and cry over something, I think, ya, he is sincere. Although they were stabbing me before, when they come I accept them back."

He is so sweet. Kind hearted. Others stab him in the back. Poor guy. Not that brilliant after all if his anointed successors have been suchdisappointmentent...

Singapore corrupt?

My suspicions about squeaky clean Singapore had some support when I saw this article in bloomberg of 11th October 2006.
Excerpts:

``Actually, Singapore's success came mostly from being the money laundering center for corrupt Indonesian businessmen and government officials,'' Xie, who was based in Hong Kong before leaving Morgan Stanley on Sept. 29, wrote in the e-mail. ``Indonesia has no money. So Singapore isn't doing well.'' ``To sustain its economy, Singapore is building casinos to attract corruption money from China,'' Xie said.

I wonder why someone who works with Morgan Stanley, a renowned international firm, would even speculate about such things. Has not Singapore always pride itself of being above board? Maybe their cover-up job is so good that everyone has been hoodwinked into thinking that what is said is true.
But looking at Indonesia for example, I could see that a certain marginalised group has benefited a lot from their business links with Singapore. When push comes to shove, as in the debacle after Suharto's fall, many seek an escape route to Singapore. It is well known that quite a number have big investments in the city state and vice versa. Maybe the long lasting Suharto regime was propped up by money from the island state. Who knows?

Question Time: The NEP quota hangover

This headline in theedgedaily of 9th October 2006 seems very apt with the current debate on the fate of the NEP. I was particularly struck by this paragraph:

"So why is this misinformation perpetrated? The simple answer would be that there are many bumiputeras, especially the politically connected, who will benefit by it - but not the large majority of bumiputeras, mind you. These bumiputeras are those who benefit from an allocation of bumiputera shares to them at concessional rates and the need to get bumiputera partners to bid for government projects and so on. Many well-connected and politically influential bumiputeras will be affected if the quota system was unwound. That explains a lot of things happening now, particularly the reluctance of the political leadership all this while to do anything about the quotas or to revise the way that it is measured so that it is meaningful. It also explains why former deputy prime minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim supported the NEP when he was in government because he needed the support of those who benefit from it. Now, in opposition, that support becomes immaterial and he can call for the NEP to be abandoned. That would also explain why former Permodalan Nasional Bhd (PNB - a vehicle specifically set up under the NEP to enhance bumiputera equity ownership) chief executive officer Datuk Khalid Ibrahim now says the NEP could destroy the Malays because of the way it is structured to help only some bumiputeras and perpetuate inefficiency and patronage. And it also explains why young leaders such as Khairy Jamaludin, deputy head of Umno Youth, who was not even born when the NEP was implemented and of whom expectations were high that he would tread a more enlightened path given his youth and idealism, strongly defended the quota system."

These are the facts which those in power would never admit. As the article said, it is to the advantage of those in power to maintain the status quo ad infinitum. The have-nots will remain where they are now and any hopes of changing that situation will require a gargantuan effort from those in power. An enlightened power which the present administration does not seem to possess. Pity the meek and the downtrodden. Their fate in life???

Wherefore public transport

I was one of the thousands of commuters in Kuala Lumpur dependent on the light rail transport system affected by the system breakdown on Friday, 6th October 2006. This letter which appeared the next day in the Star sums up quite succintly how many feel about the system(?).

"Breakdown failure on operator’s part

FIRST-CLASS infrastructure, Third-World mentality. High-tech driverless Putra LRT, bottom-rung maintenance. It's sad.

Imagine this: Thousands of commuters during Friday morning rush hour. And the train system conveniently breaks down, again. Chaos results.

Are Malaysians surprised? No. That’s what makes the entire situation so wretched.

For the past five to six months, the LRT service has been disrupted about once a month. Every time it malfunctions, Putra staff will put up the sign “We are having an unavoidable technical problem”.

Many of us have travelled on the virtually trouble-free Singapore MRT.

It's simple. If you don’t maintain the trains, the system stalls.

I urge the Transport Minister to make the following changes:

1. Fire the top management in charge of Putra LRT. Constant system failure means failure on their part.

2. Fine the company RM1mil for every hour the LRT is down. It's a small sum to pay for delaying the thousands of people who would otherwise be working and contributing to the economy.

3. Display the LRT’s KPI. Show monthly statistics on system failure, late trains, Touch ’n Go breakdown, ticketing gate malfunction, air-conditioning failure in trains and stations. In this way, I'm sure Putra will do more to improve the system to save face.

4. Fire those who can’t meet these KPIs.

Drastic action is needed for a major change.

RADICALHOP,

Petaling Jaya."

I agree whole heartedly with the writer's suggestions but I doubt any of it will see the light of day any time soon. As it is, there will be an inquiry and it would be anyone's guess whether any action will be taken after that. The planners are never the ones who use the system. They are bureaucrats, pen pushers, cocooned in their air-conditioned offices dictating what is best for the rest of city. They must use the system too to see how viable or reliable it is in action. There is a huge difference between that lovely skecth on paper with reality.

Hope

An apt article appeared in thestar 30 October 2006 after the Chinese marginalisation statement by Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew.
Those without connections will always suffer in this country as long as the ruling party continues with its present policy of giving the wealth largesse to just a select few. We are just continuing the old feudal system replete with masters and servants. That system seems to be the preferred choice of the ruling class to maintain the status quo. The only hope of a viable alternative government does not seem to have much hope of seeing the light of day in the immediate future. We are so used to the current political set-up that anything which differs from the norm might look so strange to the majority.
Whatever faults the current administration has, the bread and butter issues seems to be a top priority. But the present escalating cost of living is testing the patience of the common people. The opposition might be able to make some headway if they exploit this issue intelligently and gave a better solution than the present government. If people of this country are assured that they at least can make a decent living within the present economic conditions then maybe the other issues such as sharing equitably the economic cake and race relations can be tackled with more vigour.
We do hope the future will be better for the next generation of Malaysians.

Racial polarisation

It is always intriguing whenever the great doctor says his piece. An example appeared in the sun 28 September 2006. Part of his speech appeared in the article on the Second Congress of Leaders of Traditional Religions held in Astana, Kazakhstan on 12-13 September 2006.

The excerpt.

'It would be more effective for heads of religious institutions to convince world leaders to help remove the causes of terrorism, than trying to convince terror groups to stop their aggression. Former premier Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, an invited speaker, said this when addressing delegates during the second day of the congress. Mahathir said:"Perhaps religious heads could persuade would-be terrorists not to blow up aircraft and their passengers but frankly, I do not think this will work." He said no matter who talks to them (terror groups), the pain will always be there and these people who threaten international security have no other means to fight their powerful enemies except via terror attacks. He said the anger and frustration of the Palestinian people have reached a stage where "rationality" is no longer possible. "Bereft of other weapons, they resort to blowing themselves up and killing innocent people," he said. Mahathir said the world must realise that the strategy of "out-terrorising" the terrorists by Israel and the United States is not working. "All that we see is an escalation in their counter-attacks and the whole world feels insecure and we are even being haunted by the fear of being blown out of the sky whenever we fly," he said. He called on religious heads to convince leaders of the countries against whom the attacks are directed to try and understand the problem and deal with the root causes. Later, in response to a question by theSun, Mahathir said the fervour of multi-cultural relations in Malaysia is the same as in Kazakhstan. "But, of course, there will be groups (in Malaysia) which will try to promote differences among the races but it is up to the majority to ensure that differences are settled in a proper way," he said. Asked what may have caused racial polarisation in the country and if it will grow to become a "painful thorn on the side" in later years, he said: "It is partly due to political reasons." "Because certain parties play up Islamic issues there will be a tendency for other parties to attempt to also make use of religion to seek'religious justification' by themselves." "In the process they might become more extreme and this will lead to the kind of problems we see among the people today," he said.'

I wonder which political party made the move to be more Islamic than its opposition. Did the leader forgot the decision he made to take into the party's fold an ex-student leader who was known to have strong support among the young and those aligned to the Islamic movement. The worsening polarisation we see in the country is in a way the result of policies implemented by the great doctor in his quest to achieve his vision of a developed Malaysia. He will never acknowledge that he had a part in the current predicament that we face. Not in his character to admit that he had made a mistake. Admitting one's mistake needs a bigger man. That man is not the doctor.

Marginalised

This letter which appeared in The Star 27 September 2006 is the first opinion I've seen which agrees with Lee Kuan Yew's statement about the marginalised status of the Chinese in Malaysia and Indonesia.

The letter:

"Meritocracy is the way for our country

SINGAPORE Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew's statement on the status of the Chinese in Malaysia has drawn the ire of many local politicians.

The statement is highly provocative but it strikes right at the heart of concern for many Malaysians who have had to live under the New Economic Policy and, as a result, have been disadvantaged in one way or another.

In a way there is some truth to Lee's statement. Isn'’t it marginalisation if some deserving students are denied schorlarships due to some discriminative policies which favour one group of people over another?

Similarly, in the commercial sector many outstanding and efficient local non-bumiputra companies are sidelined due to the affirmative policies.

Are these companies not being 'marginalised'?

I am proud of my country but increasingly I feel I am being treated like a second-class citizen.

I have two young daughters and it is my sincere wish to see them grow up in an environment where they will be judged based on merit and not on race or colour.

I hope the country is able to fully embrace the concept of meritocracy soon. Otherwise statements like the one uttered by Lee will continue to haunt us.

LOW LENG HUA,

Klang."

The last paragraph on meritocracy seems to say it all. Everyone would love to see the concept of meritocracy being practiced here but I doubt it will be embraced whole heartedly by the populace. This is especially so for those who feel threatened by any signs of encroachment to their perceived birth right as they have been anointed sons of the soil.

There is also another group which may have been overlooked by the great LKY. The marginalised within the "sons of the soil" group. It is a well known fact that there are different classes in that particular society and those with links to the upper echelons or knows someone along the lines of power would most probably get an easier and smoother ride in life. To me, these are the real marginalised as they have been hoodwinked into thinking that their lot will be better with the current party and machinery. Alas, anyone with the slightest inclination to deviate from the party philosophy would be deemed a pariah and not worthy of being helped. This is despite the fact that they are their own brethren in blood and religion. Take a look at Kelantan and those who support the opposition.

Each person in this country has to fight his own battles. The battle might involve family and friends and many have given up the struggle along the way. Please do something if we feel we have a stake in this country, if we do not want a perpetuity of all the negatives winning the day. I do not have the perfect solution but I do feel the mere presence of dissenting voices bodes well for the future.

A bloom

My newly planted frangipani has given me some bloooms. This is actually a bragging act before the actual test begins. The plant arrived yesterday and had already some blooms as the man from the nursery wanted to prove that the plant does bear flowers. I was just so overjoyed this morning that the plant did not keel over during the night. Anything can happen with my gardening expertise. I'm crossing my fingers that the plant, is it a he or she I'm unsure, will accept me as its guardian as long as it is under my care. That caring stuff we will have to wait and see. Hope for the best as usual.

Neighbours

I accidentally saw something sticking out on the ledge above my kitchen a few hours ago. On closer inspection it is a rag from one of the units above me. No one has come knocking at my door inquiring about that missing piece. So I shall assume that it not wanted anymore. To the rubbish bin it goes. Most probably I'll be having more unwanted and unexpected presents from above. The vagaries of living with all sorts of people in a confined environment. I'm had it easy compared to some horror stories from others who had bigger items that could even endanger lives found in their compounds. Thankful for little mercies but I do wish this gift will stop flowing..

Money Politics

As usual the headline in the sun of 12th September 2006 is pure Dr. M.

It seems incongruous that someone who started this particular trend in the ruling party’s tradition has come out against it. Once upon a time, money was not evident during the party’s election campaign. But since that particular leader came to power, that habit of currying favour with your supporters with the aid of the big ringgit has been accepted as normal procedure. A known fact but not acknowledged publicly. If that style of campaigning is so despicable to him, why did he not stop it from the start? He may feign innocence since he does not know personally of any cases but is it a case of putting the blinkers to reality. Anyway, what is happening at the moment is a product of his legacy. If he does not like what he is seeing, he should shoulder the responsibility. Or maybe he should be proud that his supporters/successors have learnt their lessons so well from the great master. You reap what you sow.

Improvement

It was a pleasant surprise when I went for my trip to Bangkok from Kuala Lmpur on 31^st

August 2006 as well as the return journey a few days later. Passengers were not kept waiting at the terminal for hours but we were let into the plane almost on schedule. There was a slight delay, maybe about ten minutes, before the actual taxing along the runway. This is such a vast improvement compared to the definition of delayed flights adopted by air asia – half an hour. I do hope they keep up with the good work. I also look forward to my next trip to see whether this improvement will be maintained or is it just a flash in the pan.

Image from air asia picture gallery

Does the end justify the means?

The fate that has befallen Malik Imtiaz Sarwar which he wrote in nst of 27th August 2006 marks a sad day for right thinking Muslims everywhere. There are sections of the Muslim community that do not want to engage in rational discussions but prefer bulldozing their beliefs unto others. There is that concept that since the believer has fallen out, he must be punished accordingly. Doesn't that solution strengthen the unbeliever's conviction that the religion is not for him. Condemning, sentencing is so very easy. But it will never make that man closer to the religion, but most probably the opposite. We'll wait and see but I do hope that Malik survives through it all. He is but one of the few shining light that might illuminate the darkness that the community is in at the moment. May he succeed in his quest to bring light to the those who can't see.

Blew my top

I have to acknowledge that the Kuala Lumpur taxi drivers are definitely kings of the road. I slammed the door of the tenth taxi that refused to take me to my destination about 8pm 25th August 2006. That particular driver became angry and there were shouts between us. I was fortunate that he did not beat me up in the heat of the moment.

Why does anyone become taxi drivers if they do not want to take passengers. The stock excuse is the heavy traffic especially when it rains. IÂ’m sure they know the risks involved when they choose this profession. Has anyone considered the passengers? Taxi drivers have the audacity to choose whom to take and the preferred destination. In the same breath they will complain they are having a hard time making a living.

So hopefully, they will get a taste of their own medicine when they least expect it. Then they will know that their attitude works both ways. They might be under the delusion that passengers have to play by their rules. Maybe in the taxi driversÂ’ world but any action will get a reaction. Someday, somewhere they will rue the day that they ignored the plight of passengers. Passengers are their bread and butter. They forgot that particular golden rule.

The authorities themselves seem helpless even after countless complains from the public. I still have to take taxis but I need to stop another blow up. That simmering anger is not worthwhile. I can still curse under my breath and say a silent prayer that they will meet their match one fine day. Bad thoughts.

The first flowers

It was with pride and joy when I saw the flowers today. Granted, it was just two flowers. To me, it was lovely and as you may have noticed I started the paragraph with the word "pride". It might be the pride before the downfall as I'm unsure whether there will be repeat performances from them - the plants. I do hope there will be more blooms in future. There is always that bit of trepidation not knowing whether I have done too much or too little. I'm talking about another life.
In this case, the pride and joy for this particular life may not be in the same category as parents who welcome their first born. But my feelings the moment I saw the flowers was akin to those proud parents. I should pass around the cigars.
I guess I'm taking liberties with this momentous event. I definitely did not do much in terms of nurturing the plants for the past week, watered them twice. I cannot take any credit for their magnificient show of colours or those perfect petals seen through my rose tinted lenses. Nature deservedly gets the major credit.
Thanks Mother Nature. Thanks flowers. I hope to see more of you soon.

Is it really shocking?

The headline in the nst of 18th August 2006 is a classic case of "Didn't you know all this is happening".

An excerpt:

One in two young adults are having sex. Unnerving? Try this. Eighty per cent of them do not use contraceptives.
What do you expect? When sex education is still a mundane taboo subject. Any student who does attend the classes may know the basics but practicising safe sex is a different ball game altogether. The sexual urges that peaks during the growing up years has to find an outlet somewhere and somehow irrespective of the edicts reprimanding the sexual act between unmarried couples. So, in the throes of passion, a lot of safety factors are conveniently forgotten.

The young ones do not think of death. The future is theirs. A different and a more holistic approach has to be found or else we will see more youth falling by the side..

Image from conceptimages

NO for now???

The headline in the nst of 15th August 2006 screamed at you that the decision on the bridge was final. I doubt that will satisfy the good doctor. He will continue to rant and rave since it was one of his pet baby projects.

The good doctor may have forgotten that the response from his successor and the cabinet follows exactly the lessons learnt during his 22 years tenure as the major domo of this country. The good doctor may recall that he did not even entertain any thoughts contrary to his vision and often times was dismissive of them. The doctor felt that his vision was the only route to progress for the nation. That path has taken us some ways towards a better standard of living etc but at what price. There are certain quarters who also forgot the fact that others do not have the same vision.

The good doctor is upset that his chosen heir has a different vision and method of doing things. Too bad. Or is this just the comeuppance that he deserves...

Artist impression of bridge from thestar 15th July 2006

My garden

At last a semblance of greenery in my miniscule plot of land. I'm not sure how long the plants will last as I neither have green thumbs or am the most dedicated person when it comes to taking care of living things. One of the reasons I do not have pets or plants is the thought of neglecting or abusing them. We shall see how long this green thing lasts.

Sensitive issues

It is interesting that there is now a ban on inter-religious discussions applicable to everyone according to thestar of 11th August 2006.

I love the way the word sensitive is used in this context. Now at last it is acknowledged that everyone is sensitive over the issue. But why? Is this the result of our very harmonious society, paraded around the world as an exemplary multi-racial, multi-religion nation. As if the those in power are so naive.

The old edict of divide and rule is still used by those who seek power. It is to their advantage that the nation is not united. The populace just tags along as long as the bread and butter issues are well taken care off. Even that is debatable.

I have not heard of any civilised heart to heart discussions between leaders on the sensitive issue of religion. One side is always adamant that there should be no compromise when it comes to religion. They are always right and everyone should follow. Humanity is missing. They have never even thought of putting themselves in the other's shoes. I'm sure they are following the Book to the tee but I've yet to see any mention that you should bulldoze your way to show your might. Compassion yes, but pig-headednes, definitely not.

I wish and double wish that these leaders would come to their senses. People are not automatons. They have feelings just like you and me. Please oh please, give a chance to the other view. Listen and you can even argue, but please do it in a civilised manner. Do not use the bullying tactics or a show of strength. The other side will react and the consequences might be even more painful than the infamous May 1969 incident.

Picture is of the Malaysian Home Minister, Datuk Seri Mohd Radzi Sheikh Ahmad, from thestar of 25th February 2006.

Extinct turtles?

Compare the reports from the UN Environment programme which appeared in cosmosmagazine the 8th August 2006 and the feedback from the Turtle and Marine Ecosystem Centre (Tumec) which appeared in thestar of 10th August 2006. What is the difference between "declined drastically"” and "“effectively extinct"”. The Tumec head disputes the effectively extinct verdict in the UN report.

He said the authorities found five nesting places with 336 eggs of two leatherback turtles this year compared to one nesting place with 90 eggs in 2005. In 2003, 14 leatherback nesting places, with 1,083 eggs, were detected while in 2004, five nesting places with 295 eggs were found.

I do not see any encouraging news from those statistics. Anyone can see that two turtles landing is a very dismal figure and this is already August 2006. Yes, I guess we can try and save the whole population starting from those two but isn't this a case of too little too late. That has always been the predicament faced by those involved with conservation in Malaysia. There is a lot of talk but any action taken leaves much to be desired. Lack of political will is one of the major contributing factors to this situation. I doubt the situation will change that much unless and until those in power realize that the non-human population is also important to this country.

We have inadvertently killed the goose that lay the golden egg.

Picture from cosmosmagazine

First choice in Singapore, not here

That is the heading of a letter from a reader published in thestar 22 June 2006.

One particular paragraph summed up the dilemma.

"At first, I was reluctant to accept any of the offers by the Singapore universities as I thought I had a responsibility to serve my country.

Moreover, the Government has been working hard in addressing our country's brain drain problem."

That paragraph speaks volumes about the sentiments of “the others”, since it is usually this group that gets rejected from Malaysian universities despitfulfillingng all the requirements. Unfortunately, they could never cross to the other side of the road unless they become Muslims.

It is tragic, unsavoury and demeaning to say the least when your own country does not want you just because you are not one of them. The government may say otherwise but reality stares glaringly bright. This does not happen only in education but throughout the broad spectrum of Malaysian life.

The leading brains should just stop wasting their time trying to get back the brain that has gone away. If the so-called think-tank could not or would not point out the government's policy blunders, the trend will continue ad infinitum. All the talk about unity in diversity would just be paying lip service to higher ideals. No action, just talk.

Why the Malay Agenda won’t help Malays

This article sums up quite neatly what is happening among the Malays in Malaysia today - 2006. This article is in theedgedaily and the printed version appeared on 12 June 2006.

Some excerpts.

"But more often than not, it'’s not the community they are looking out for. They are looking out for themselves and for very narrow interests within the community, often at the expense of the very community they purport to represent."

"They" in this article refers to the leaders of the Malay community. How so very true but of course it is not acknowledged by "them". There are also supporters who do not mind being their lackeys as long as they get their share of the largesse. A continuation of the feudal lord-servant mentality, perhaps?

"The new Malay Agenda must recognise that a clean, efficient and incorruptible government serves the Malay's best interests and that what is good for the country as a whole is good for the Malays too because they form the majority in the country. In many ways, the new Malay Agenda will also be a Malaysian Agenda."

A most heartening wish. I do hope it will become a reality but I doubt this will happen in my lifetime. Maybe in the next generation or two if everyone is willing to put the good of the community first. That will be the day.

Fragile faith

It takes the Prime Minister himself, check thestar 16 June 2006, to put a stop to the so-called fatwa that the kongsi raya celebrations is a big no-no for muslims. I’m sure he’ll be cursed to kingdom come for being bold enough to issue such a statement. This will be another test whether the PM’s vision of a moderate Islam can withstand the pummeling from the established conservative religious scholars.

The fight will be an uphill struggle since the religious establishment is always adamant that their interpretation is the correct version of how we should lead our lives as Muslims. Any suggestions otherwise is dismissed as half-baked ideas from those not qualified to delve into religious matters.

We will wait and see what will be their next move.

Ulamas want kongsi raya celebrations reviewed

That headline appeared in the The Star 14th June 2006.

Here we go again. Why do Islamic religious leaders in Malaysia keep on harping on minor issues. There are other important and urgent issues to be discussed rather than a review of practices such as the 'kongsi raya' celebrations and open house. It seems this is to ensure that the celebrations do not contradict Islamic laws.

'the National Fatwa Committee had decided that celebrating the festivals of other religions could erode the faith of Muslims and could lead to blasphemy.'

Has there been any indications of such thing happening. I for one who is not well versed in Islamic laws cannot see what went wrong. I have always thought that once the fundamental allegiance that there is 'Only One God That Is Allah and Muhammad is His Messenger' has been made, all else will follow suit. The Muslims will learn about the good and bad guided by that oath.

The open house concept is just celebrating each others big day. I do not see any wavering from that fundamental oath. I'm sure there are some Muslims who partake of forbidden things during those festivities but I doubt they have forgotten that oath or have had a change of heart and change their allegiance to others.

The leaders must look again at what exactly is affecting the community. Are they afraid of losing the flock. If that really is the case, should not the way the religion has been thought be reviewed. At the moment the hell and brimstone aspect is emphasised and the beauty of the whole concept of Islam has been neglected. The Muslims in Malaysia seem to be Muslims in name but the love for their religion is missing. The externals are there but the fundamentals are not internalised. What a shame.

And who, really, is demonising whom?

That is the title in the New Sunday Times 11 June 2006 from the man who has been accused of masterminding a 'blackout' of the good doctor in the Press.

At least we know his point of view which generally reflects what a lot of people think of the current rantings of the good doctor. I'm not sure the good doctor sees the whole picture and consequences of his rantings. If push comes to shove will he come out squeaky clean. As the saying goes people who live in glass houses should not throw stones.

The good doctor is only human. He is not infallible. I have not detected an iota of humility when the good doctor speaks of his frustrations with the current administration's handling of national affairs. The good doctor's plans or vision is not for me at least my plan or vision for this country. The cabinet's agreement with the good doctor while he was in power is more a reflection of the yes-men mentality of the whole group that surrounded him. Any dissent is always dismissed. Just look at Musa Hitam and Daim Zainuddin's resignations.

The good doctor always knows best even if the medicine kills the patient in the process. Take a look at the damage done to the environment in the name of progress. For a doctor, he has failed miserably to take account the fragile nature of this temporary abode we call Earth. He knows if we take step A, we will gain something in terms of economic and monetary progress. But what about the opportunity cost? There has been a lot of objections to his vision and the minority groups that were affected negatively by those plans. But since they are the small people who are inconsequential to the whole scheme of thing, their voices have been silenced.

That is our good doctor.

Some opinions on the good Dr's comments

A few opinion pieces today 9^th June 2006 from Rehman Rashid at NSTP as well as Wong Chun Wai and Joceline Tai at the Star sums up quite neatly what is happening.

I find this statement from Joceline intriguing:

'What he said on Wednesday was perhaps the deepest cut. It amounted to disowning his choice of successor and was as good as a severing of ties. But can one disown one's own decision without casting some aspersions on oneself?'

The good doctor has not come clean on why he chose Abdullah over Najib. Is Abdullah in his eyes a pushover, to be manipulated behind the scenes? That would be ideal for the circle around the doctor as they would benefit the most from any decisions that are in their favour.

But so far, Abdullah has been his own man. The business community might argue that the economic pace has slowed down compared to the halcyon days of the doctor. But has everyone forgotten the high price we paid and still are paying for those projects. The consequent social problems.

For example, the construction industry had a heyday with so many government spearheaded projects. The labour force comes from abroad with their own attendant problems. The local work force are set aside since the industry argues that the imported labour is cheaper. At what price. The hallmark of the doctor's schemes have always been 'implement the plan at whatever cost to the nation'. Whereas his successor tries to take a more holistic approach. An overall view of the opportunity costs that will accrue if this or that project is carried out. Of course he is not perfect. A different style entirely and that bugs the good doctor to the core.

Here we go again

Today the 8th June 2006 big news in most of the dailies is about the good doctor again as in the New Straits Times

Some excerpts:

Dr Mahathir complained that the new Government had cancelled several major projects initiated during his two decades in power, despite assurances they would be carried out after he left office.

Hmmm, I wonder whether he is talking on behalf those who have been left out of the money making machine. - big projects. The present PM is just continuing the previous administration's legacy in other areas and the spoils goes to the inner circle of the present leadership.

He is also upset that the pace of development of Putrajaya has slowed; peeved that the Johor bridge project has been scrapped; and angered that the National Automotive Policy has put Proton at a disadvantage.

All those projects mentioned and others as well have their detractors from the start. The previous leader has never entertained any disagreements to his vision, a classic example of doctor knows best. Some of the plans worked well but others seem more half baked than anything else. There are some projects like the Bakun Dam that should have been given more thought but it was just pushed through hurriedly.

"One cannot tell what a person will do when the person is out of your control," Dr Mahathir said yesterday. "I thought I had made the right choice."

A telling statement. He controls people. So why the surprise and frustration when the person is out of his control? It is just a logical progression for those who have been so long under the rule of one man to try and breath easier and try to do their own thing in their own way. It is just the wheel of fortune turning as usual if some of the things seem the opposite of what been agreed during his leadership.

He can continue his vigilance over the present administration but to harp on the change in attitude and direction seems naive. They are just implementing what has been learned during his leadership – power in one hand and be damned to all opposition.

Misyar marriages

I'’m not knowledgeable about the haram or halal of the arrangement. That would need further research. On first glance, a marriage just to satisfy the sexual needs of both partners by exchanging marriage vows without any financial responsibility on the man's part seems ideal. According to those well versed in Islamic laws there is nothing sinister about the arrangement since the woman has agreed.

I wonder whether this is just slightly above the usual cohabitation arrangements practiced by a number of couples nowadays or even the state of some legally sanctioned marriages, in terms of ethics and morality. One of the arguments supporting this kind of marriage is to lessen the incidence of sexual acts outside the legally sanctioned marriage institution. It seems this arrangement would be an avenue for single woman who are financially independent but with no luck in the man stakes to fulfill her sexual needs. This is where the man comes along to 'help'’. He is the proverbial stud but does not have to be responsible for the woman'’s material needs. How convenient. As the experts say, the woman has agreed. So there!!!!

Lelaki Komunis Terakhir - Curtains

At last, the final curtain has fallen on Lelaki Komunis Terakhir (The Last Communist). Would this be the harbinger of the future fate of independent, non-mainstream thoughts and ideas? We have always tried to push the boundaries of accepted liberalism in this country. The internet age has managed in a way to level the playing field. Alas, the internet itself is full of inconsequential gibberish that prudence is required.

The silent majority has to play a bigger role in demanding that differences in opinions are not evil incarnate undermining the security and prosperity of the country. The ban will definitely not stop others from starting their own "‘controversial"’ projects. I guess this ban will see pirated sales of the film in our night markets. Too bad the producers themselves would not be able to make any profits from the sales unless they make a pact with the pirates. That arrangement would certainly help the producers in recouping their investment and at least help finance future projects.

I wait patiently for the next Amir film which is still at the production stage, "Susuk" to gain its fair share of notoriety.

The Last Communist: Umno supreme council to view film and advise on ban

I just love the heading in the New Straits Times 23 May 2006.

Some excerpts:

"Radzi said even the title 'Lelaki Komunis Terakhir' had caused quite a stir among the people.

"When you mention the title, many will react to it. Some will ask why we are championing an issue that caused the sufferings of our forefathers. It is not right," he said."

So, the title is the crucial point. That means Amir, the director of the said film must take note of this observation from the honourable minister himself. Next time he makes a movie, he must use that very apt title 'Senario Cinta Mawi' as mentioned in his own blog lastcommunist.blogspot.com. But that title itself might give the wrong connotation. So please play safe. As a very bright person, I'm sure he'll be able to come up with something along the lines of Gerak Khas or Man Laksa.

"Asked if he had watched the documentary, Radzi said he had. However, he declined to say what he thought of it. He only said it depended 'on circumstances'."

An action that shows transparency of the highest order? Is big brother watching? He declined to say what he thought as it will also depend on circumstances. A classic example of survival of the fittest and the bottomline is, we must take care of our rice bowl. So please do not rock the boat. A very good and prudent move. Ten brownie points and may more of his ilk be in the cabinet...

The abandoned forum in Penang

The New Sunday Times 21 May 2006 had an interview with one of those who protested against the forum.
Some comments...

"Q: But Muslims were among panelists at the forum?

A: Unfortunately, other Muslims do not see them as representative of the community. They have their own secular, liberal, understanding of Islam. They want Syariah to be placed along with universal values and are in favour of a secular society in a secular state.

Because they are not representing the Muslim community, they are actually representing a secular minority group. We feel that what they stand for is their own perception of Islam.

They want Islam to be just a private matter and that Syariah law should only be used in handling private matters. They do not represent the community or what Islam stands for in this country."

I guess everything is already cast in stone. We can't even discuss certain issues among Muslims. If one authority has declared that his interpretation is the correct version, everyone has to follow. Haven't we learnt from history itself that Islam went through a lot of upheavals. There were lots of views, interpretations and discussions. Shouldn't that be the norm rather than the exception?

"Q: What should Article 11 do to defuse the situation?

A: There are mechanisms to address their grievances. They can meet the Attorney-General since some of the cases they discussed included conversion.

The forum touched on issues that have already been decided upon. If people don’t agree, they have to meet the A-G and see if there is a mechanism to settle it.

That is better as you don’t need to arouse the sentiments of Muslims. But they start going around saying that Syariah is not protecting the rights of non-Muslims. This is absurd."

Isn't it an assumed conclusion that once someone had converted to Islam in Malaysia he is governed by the Syariah courts. What recourse does the non-Muslim family have in the Syariah courts? Usually the Syariah court judges are dismissive of those who seek the court's help as evidenced by the many instances of single mothers going countless times to get their rightful dues. What more someone of a different faith. Even a Muslim woman unveiled is asked to veil herself first before any proceeding will continue????

The controversy of conversions will continue as long as those in power do not show any compassion towards the non-Muslim family. I'm certain that Islam does not condone breaking families due to the conversion of one family member to the religion. This is where discussion is vital. The protesters can say what they want, but the responsibility is squarely on their shoulders to ensure that justice is meted out equally to the non-Muslim family. I wonder if they have ever thought of being in the other person's shoes???

Australian's 'last wish' is to get PR status

That was one of the headlines in New Straits Times 3 May 2006.

This is interesting to say the least. A non-Malaysian who fell in love with the country and wants to spend the rest of his days here. I hope he gets his wish. There have been countless cases previously which tell almost the same story. A non-Malaysian falling for the charms that this country has and willing to uproot themselves from their country of origin in order to spend their life here.

This is in contrast to the reluctance shown by Malaysians who have made it good abroad and are in two minds about coming back here. Their only existing ties might still be some family and friends. I'm sure there are a multitude of factors which made them make that decision.

The government's efforts to stem this brain drain is pointless if the target does not feel attached to the country. No amount of incentive would change their mind since this country is not attractive to them anymore.

Maybe the government should look into giving better treatment to those who have stayed behind. They are the ones who have made the country what it is today through thick and thin. What we see now is still not perfect and no one country can claim that distinction.

With all its flaws, this country is what it is now through the efforts of those who stayed behind. This group of people should get better recognition for their contributions. This would surely make better economic sense that trying to woo those who have always been reluctant to come back from the beginning.

Why is he so angry?

The headline "Dr Mahathir: Malaysia a ‘half-past-six country with no guts’ if ... " in the New Straits Times 2 May 2006 is very intriguing.

“He said as a citizen, he had a right to do so if the country’s sovereignty was surrendered.”

When did the present leadership surrender our country's sovereignty? The moment the decision was made to abandon the bridge project? There was nothing wrong with the project per se, but the extra baggage that went with the ambitious plans made us a laughing stock. The plan to have that half bridge seems very childish, just to spite the neighbour. If he was still the PM and the project went ahead, it will not help in improving the traffic or the water flow.

"Even if I were to give it to you to publish, you will not do it.

"Even if you do, Kalimullah will chop it," he said, referring to New Straits Times Press deputy chairman and editorial adviser Datuk Kalimullah Hassan.”

This seems to be a classic case of the pot calling the kettle black. Didn’t he use his power to prevent others from publishing their opinion in the mainstream media? At least his rantings are still published. So there is no reason to complain.

He is still a very angry man after all these years. After more than 20 years in power. There must more than what we see from this whole episode and through his previous his outbursts. Is he really concerned about the country or speaking up more on behalf of those near and dear who have lost their opportunity to make their pot of gold.

Trainee Dies In NS Camp Brawl

That is the headline in the New Sunday Times 23 April 2006.

I guess this tragedy was just waiting to happen after all the previous news about the shortcomings in the camps - attempted rapes, salary not being paid, trainess being bullied etc. The whole scheme seems to be plagued by problems from day one.
It was a very noble idea to have this scheme supposedly to integrate the youths of the country more cohesively. How do you expect a few months togetherness to bring that elusive harmony and integration when the main racial issues is still swept under the carpet.
Just look at our education policy. The moment a child enters school, he is made aware of how different he is from others not of the same race or religion. There are no concerted effort to ensure that these differences are not barriers to integration. Instead, we see overzealous teachers who go out of their way to strengthen the common misperceptions that we have of each other.

Condolences to the family and others who are sending their children to the NS camps.

Point Blank

A very appropriate headline. This is the the front page of the New Straits Times, 4 April 2006.
I guess the frustrations of the Inspector General of Police is felt by the public too. I doubt his speech would leave that much of a dent on the police force. An entrenched culture of so many negatives takes more than just a speech to rectify. It will take another IGP or two to see some improvements.
Why does this happen. A million dollar question. Most probably the causes are multi-faceted and the solutions would need a gargantuan effort from everyone interested in seeing a clean, efficient and trustworthy police force become the pride of the nation. I doubt again whether that will happen in my life time.
I wonder how the guilty ones sleep at night. Peacefully??? I guess so since there has been no let up in the number of incidents involving shady dealings between the police and public. I also wonder whether any thought comes to the minds of those black sheeps. I guess it is a sign of the times. We make the best use of whatever advantage that we have. However small or insignificant to others, the power held by the ordinary policeman is supreme in his area of jurisdiction. That power leaps to gigantic proportions when the particular constable is promoted. The rank that comes with the job and the knowledge that you can use it for your benefit. A heady proposition.

Low cost carrier terminal

At last, I've experienced the terminal. The building itself reflects the low cost emphasis. Someone said it reminded her of the hypermarkets. Very true.
The lines going through the baggage security checks were haphazard. It is still early days for the terminal but some sort of order is necessary so that there will be smooth operations from point A to B. A much more efficient system has to be implemented. A better system would enable passengers to experience a less hassle free journey.
The walk to the airplane was another first after the old airport at Subang. Passengers had to follow designated paths to their respective carriers. The lines look like disciplined ducks walking back to their nests. The rain that day did not help to improve the efficiency. The flight was delayed due to some technical problem. I hope this aspect of the delays will be just a memory once the new planes start replacing the old ones.
Anyway, this would not be my last experience here since despite everything, I will still be using a low cost carrier as one of the means to travel far and wide.

Hang the noose - Abolish the death penalty?

This is the heading in NST 21 March 2006.

Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz said: "For me, a life is a life. No one has the right to take someone else’s life, even if that person has taken another life."

This seems to be a very noble idea but I wonder whether the feeling is the same if the victim is one of our loved ones. A death sentence will never bring back our loved one but it is one way to compensate for the loss. The penalty is just like a compensation for the victim's family - an eye for an eye. It has always been said that it would be better for the family to forgive the guilty party as another death serves no purpose.
Easier said than done and the harder to adhere if the perpetrator committed the crime mercilessly.

Don’t interfere in Islam, non-Muslims warned

Let us just change some of the sentences in the article which appeared in today's thestar

“”Muslims should not interfere in the religious affairs of non -Muslims, as this will make the non- Muslims uneasy.

Expressing his concern about some recent articles written by Muslims, he said the tolerance level among non-Muslims was high

“But you must remember the word amok comes from this country and there is a limit to everything,” he said, telling Muslims not to make comments or write articles on non-Islam that could be construed as belittling the religion.

“I want to remind Muslims to refrain from making statements on something they do not understand,”….

“We do not want to take away your rights but religion is an important matter, especially to the non-Muslims,” he said. On whether Muslim journalists should not write about issues concerning non-Islam, Nazri said they should know what they could or could not write.

“However, there are some things which should not be touched on,” he said.””

Each sentence seems reasonable on its own. The Muslim/Non-muslim, Islam/non-Islam phrases could be interchanged with the same effect on the target group.

What irks me is the statement's tone. It seems more like an edict carved in stone without any recourse for redress.

Has the speaker ever been in the ‘others’ shoes. I guess not. Born into a privileged group, I doubt thoughts of others’ feeling come into his mind. Tolerance??? Understanding???

How do you expect others to emphatise with Muslims if one of their leaders rides roughshod over others. This has been going on for umpteen years and I have not seen any change in the current administration.

Please buck up and face reality. Do unto others what you would like to do unto yourself. If you were in 'their' shoes...

Cabinet approval for public transport fund

That is the big news on the front page of the New Straits Times. Finally, the public transport sector is getting the attention it deserves which has been overdue for a long time. I wonder whether this attention came about only because of the recent big oil price increase. Previously, any master plan for the country pays scant regard to the needs of the public who need an efficient reasonably priced transportation system. The emphasis for the past twenty years was on building the highways. There was low priority for other means of transportation, for example a mass rapid transportation system for the urban areas or a similar system linking the major towns.

I suspect this emphasis to cater to the needs of the car driving public has something to do with the national car industry. It is an egg and chicken situation. The nation wants to leap frog into the developed group of nations by shifting to a more industrialized based economy from the previously rural based economy. The nation’s leader put up a plan to galvanise all resources into the national car industry. The national car industry became a cause celebre which has to be a success by whatever means.

I have not seen anything to be proud of after so many years. The much hyped technology transfer has not materialized and the quality or standards seem stuck at least a few years behind the competitors. Why was our limited resources channeled to the car project instead of a better public transportation system that can benefit all walks of society.

The present administration has to undo quite a lot of things that has been the norm for the past generation. Good luck.

THE Cartoons

At last I found an article that neatly sums up what I feel about the current brouhaha over the cartoons that is being published again and again around the world...

An excerpt from Martin Khor's article in the Star:

"Press freedom is not absolute even though editors especially those in the West may profess or think that it is. There are double standards in this regard practised in the West too.
As pointed out in a letter in an English paper, the United States and British papers comply with requests not to publish photographs of American and British soldiers killed in Iraq or even highlight the return home of the bodies.
The governments don’t want such photos to further affect public opinion against the war and occupation. Western newspapers are very careful not to publish articles that can be construed as being anti-Jew.
If they do, it is almost certain they will come under attack for being anti-Semite and probably have to apologise. There are guidelines, whether formal or informal, so that journalists and editors avoid insulting women or homosexuals.
But when it comes to cartoons of the most revered figure in Islam, the editors of some of the most established newspapers in Europe see fit to state that they have the right to publish them in the name of freedom and so what if some Muslims feel insulted. "

More details Martin Khor

As for Muslims, I hope they stop being violent whenever someone comments negatively about them and their religion. I doubt burning the Danish embassy or boycotting goods from Europe would help enlighten others about Islam. Islam will always be construed as a violent, dogmatic and backward religion fit for the disillusioned whenevwer angry mobs resort to violence to show their displeasure over some issue. However hard it may be to keep calm, it must be done. Rational debate is the only way to prove to the world that Islam is an enlightened path fit to be a guideline for everyone in every situation and for all times.

Why is there a long queue?

This question asked by a lady on Saturday 28 Jan 2006 seemed a bit redundant to me. The question is in context of the long queue at the Air Asia check-in counter. But of course, there is a long queue. The Air Asia promotional campaign has been quite a success. It was also the week long holidays in conjunction with the Chinese New Year. Air Asia is a budget airline and will do its utmost to cut costs. At the moment they have been allocated a few rows for checking in their passengers at KLIA. There is no such thing as premier check-in counters. First come first served. If anyone wants the queue to be shorter, they should discourage others from taking Air Asia. That would be one way to minimise the number of passengers and shorten the queue.
The new terminal for low cost carriers might help to ease the congestion and it won't be ready until the middle or end of 2006. In the meantime, if anyone doesn't like the services provided by Air Asia, they are encouraged to use other airlines. I'm sure Air Asia welcomes any feedback on their services but consumers must be aware, there is always a price to pay for everything. Budget airlines work within certain parameters. There is just so much that they can or are willing to do.

THE Memorandum

The Sun's editorial today put the whole issue succinctly in perspective. The last paragraph says

"While inter-religious marriages are a boon to a multi-religious society, conversions, if not properly done, can also lead to much suspicion and resentment. Non-Muslims should also be made aware and forewarned that, for the moment, conversion to Islam is very much a one-way street.
So the problem that led to the illfated memorandum still needs to be tackled even though the memorandum itself is history."

My sentiments exactly. Malaysia has always bragged about its racial harmony but it is still a fragile entity. I feel the politicians will always take advantage of the racial and religious issues to gain political milage. The victims - the general public.
Almost everyone I know at the grassroots level are busy with their daily lives, career and family. Of course everyone has an opinion on what is happening in the country but they have voted the elected representatives to do the job of managing our destiny. There will always be hiccups along the way but some major and fundamental issues like the conversion issue should not be brushed aside. The 'sensitive' issue reason is almost always used to keep things quiet. How long will this go on?

A day at the Malaysian Immigration Office

I reached the number issuing booth at 8.45 am and my number was 1138. They were servng number 1019 at that time. Yippee. I should be finished in an hours' time. But alas, I was only finally called to send in my passport renewal application at 12.00pm. After the checks and thumb prints taken I was asked to wait for my number to be called again. This time for payment. The wait took another 15 minutes.
I waited 3.5 hours for the whole process which took only about 5 minutes. The time spent on each applicant was not that long as the personnel were quite efficient in doing their work. 210 hours divided by 119 people gives about 1.7 minutes per applicant. That is remarkable considering there were a few who took just one number but was in actual fact giving more than one application form to the counter clerk. These would be those who came with their entire family. I saw a few with 4 or 5 kids in tow.
Kudos to the department for efficiency. The negative side was just the feeling that there were no one attending to the applicants as numerous numbers keep flashing on the screen but your own. I forgot there are different categories of applications and at first glance it seems as if my number is not in the queue. But all is well and I should get my new passport on Wednesday.

Shanon Shah at Alexis

I came with an open mind as always and did not expect anything spectacular. I have not heard his songs before but his self penned 'Jurutera' - engineer - left a good impression. The night went smoothly with renditions from his album as well as songs from other artistes.
The highlight for me was listening to Sukania. She has always been my favourite person and her presence alone made the night a worthwhile effort. Ida was the next friends that came to the mike and she did not dissappoint. Sultry looks and voice is a deadly combination.
The three of them sang Imagine as the last time and managed to get the crowd to sing along. Wonderful stmosphere. Alas the night had to come to a close and Shanon sang a few more songs before ending the night on an upbeat mode.

5 days into the new year

There has not been any major changes to my own personal life so far and the world keeps turning merrily on its axis around the sun. The human populace of this blue planet or slightly greying in some parts have managed to usher in the new year in more or less a happy state. The media has not highlighted any major calamities either man made or those brought on by Mother Nature.

I do hope we will manage our affairs better this year so at least there will be something to be proud of to talk about next year. That will be the day....

New Year???

My first blog of the year after ages neglecting the site. New Year resolution - keep the blog more up to date.
Has the new year really began. It seems like yesterday that 2005 was in full swing and now 2006 beckons with all its trials and tribulations. I'm not sure I'll be afloat going through the muck I've created throughout the past one year. I can see a little bit of hope here and there but most probabaly I'll get through most of the time in my own fashion. Which is not that good. I do have to make some improvements to the way I carry on with my life while on this earth. Or else, kaput, everything will go down the drain and no one to blame but myself...